Quick Drive: 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser Classic

Reviews I By Winding Road Staff I April 28, 2010

Depending on your visual tastes, the charm of Chrysler’s PT Cruiser is that it radiates a whimsical, old-timey, hot-rod vibe from the outside, yet is incredibly spacious, versatile, and just plain useful on the inside. Whether you’re schlepping three or four kids to various after-school activities, or hauling large and bulky items, the Cruiser takes them all in stride and without anybody or anything feeling cramped for space. More so than most cars, this one welcomes double duty as a quasi-minivan. I’ve had experiences with PT Cruisers in the past (yep, I actually used to own one of the first-generation models) where I would use the car to transport large home theater systems of the type I often review for our sister magazine, The Perfect Vision. At times, I would pull up at my destination and begin unloading, only to have onlookers positively gawk over the sheer amount of stuff the PT could hold. That’s the good news.

The not-so-good news is that the PT is, at this point, a design that’s showing its age in many different ways. First, the standard four-cylinder engine, which was never a whole lot of fun in the first place (at least not in normally aspirated form), is dragged even further down by a four-speed automatic that feels well and truly antiquated. Step on the gas and you may get a downshift (or two), plus angry sewing machine noises from under the hood, but you won’t see the PT moving forward with much alacrity. Steering is positive and reasonably direct, yet it also feels slightly elastic—a sensation that’s only amplified by the fact that this is one of those cars that exhibits a moderate degree of body roll before finally taking a set and then delivering meaningful amounts of turn-in response. As a result, handling is actually not too bad, though it is also not particularly fun or responsive.

The interior is a mixed bag. As mentioned above, it’s a marvel of space utilization, and material choices are fairly good (especially in light of the vehicle’s low sticker price), but certain surface treatments (for example, the matte silver applique that covered our tester’s dashboard center stack) convey an unfortunate, slap-dash feeling of cheapness (personally, I feel the first-generation PT was better in this respect than the second-generation version is).

At the end of the day, though, the PT Cruiser states its case by offering an awful lot of utility value, complete with a modicum of style, for a very modest price. That’s the basic value proposition that has kept this model alive long after theoretically more appealing competitors have come and gone.

—Chris Martens

The PT Cruiser is, in a way, emblematic of Chrysler’s problems these days. It is a pretty good car that seems tired mostly because of familiarity. It doesn’t seem like it would have taken much to get around this problem, but Chrysler didn’t have what it takes, however small that was.

You have to admire the idea of an affordable, stylish car that has impressive functionality, and the PT Cruiser tries hard on all three fronts. Base price is $18k, which is reasonable. The design is different, and there is evidence of non-generic thinking inside and out. And the rear seat room, along with cavernous carrying capacity, really makes this a practical choice.

So, after driving it for a week, you start to wonder why it seems tired. In my observation it starts with the styling. You just have to change up a fashionable design like this more often, especially when the cues all date to the ‘30s or ‘50s and the group of people who fondly remember those eras is slowly going away. Then we get to the driving dynamics. Many cars from the former Big Three are rather softly sprung, and the PT Cruiser continues this tradition. Problem is, this approach makes the PT feel heavy and unresponsive. Too much Buick LeSabre, not enough Honda Fit. Compounding that problem is the fact that the PT is just plain slow.

It sounds worse than it is, and really the PT Cruiser is a nice car. But it could be better, and it needs to be to transcend its origins.

—Tom Martin

Pros

  • Super spacious interior
  • Styling is still unique after all these years
  • Low base price

Cons

  • 2.4-liter I-4 is noisy and underpowered
  • Antiquated four-speed auto
  • Soft suspension does little to inspire confidence

The Guide to Road Racing: Winding Road Magazine's ultimate guide to getting your start in racing.

Table of Contents

Related Articles

Driven: 2023 Acura Integra A-Spec

Its action was light at low speeds, loaded up in corners, and confidently weighted on the highway, which is the ideal setup in any new car.

November 09, 2022
Another Porsche Book? Yes and We Love It!

Porsche, deservingly if you ask us, has been covered over and over in a series of coffee table books. So, why another one? Can it really add value?

October 21, 2022
Best Electric Cars for Teens & New Drivers (10 Great Models) – 2022 Edition

The good news is that there are several great electric cars on the market that are perfect for teens.

October 07, 2022
Driven: 2022 BMW M4 6-Speed Manual

For potentially the last fully internal combustion M-level 4 Series, ever, we were hoping for better out of the 2022 BMW M4.

October 03, 2022
Review: Bell Racing RS7C LTWT Carbon Helmet

The Bell Racing RS7C LTWT Carbon is a pretty compelling helmet. It offers best in class ventilation and airflow, in addition to being one of the lightest helmets in its category.

September 20, 2022

EMAIL SIGN UP

Get the latest driving and racing news straight to your inbox.

no thanks

Begin typing your search above and press return to search.